Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is an established immunoassay used to quantify various cytokines. However, conventional ELISA, is not readily amenable for screening the large numbers of samples required for proteomic screenings due to the fact that it requires many processes and large quantities of antibody. For proteomic research, high throughput screening would benefit from an immunoassay that requires minimal manipulation and uses only a small amount of the compounds for screening. One such ELISA based method, beads-based cytokine measurement, has been developed and used for profiling of allergic states.9
In addition to ELISA-based methods, fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay (FLISA) has been established as a method for HTS.10 This system enables high throughput measurements and could be applied to the assessment of various factors such as cytokines or chemical mediators in allergic responses. A typical FLISA method involves the preparation of antibody-coated beads using streptavidin beads diluted in phosphate-buffered saline. A portion of the biotinylated anti-factor X monoclonal antibody (mAb) is added to the streptavidin beads solution and the uncaptured antibodies removed. Fluorometric microvolume immunoassay for factor-X is performed with an aliquot of samples placed into a 96-well plate. An aliquot of the beads mixture (antibody beads) is conjugated with anti-factor-X mAb. Appropriate buffer is then mixed with the sample or standard in each well and incubated for several hours at room temperature in the dark. After incubation, the 96-well plate is scanned using a macro confocal imaging system (Fig. 1). The average fluorescence per bead is recorded. A fluorescent microvolume assay technology instrument consists of a detector integrated with a bar code reader and a robotic plate handler that can accommodate large amounts of samples. A helium/neon laser is used to map the topology of the microplate bottom, and performs 256 scans across an area 1 mm × 1 mm × 100 mm deep. The emitted fluorescence passes through the same optical path as the excitation beam and a dichroic beam splitter for detection by photomultiplier tubes through filters.
The FLISA method is similar to a conventional ELISA method, but has several advantages. ELISA requires many incubation and wash steps, and also requires large amount of reagents such as monoclonal antibodies, making it practically unsuitable for screening large numbers of samples. In addition to this problem, ELISA can be influenced by temperature gradients in the microtiter plates. Studies using microtitration plates have demonstrated that a temperature gradient could exist between peripheral and center wells of an ELISA plate; a gradient that may cause differences in an enzyme reaction between peripheral and center wells using microtitration plates, the so called edge-effect.11, 12 Samples must be handled carefully in ELISA to prevent edge-effects, whereas, FLISA has no enzyme reaction at the calorimetric phase, involving only the binding reaction of the antibody, so that edge-effects should be smaller in FLISA than ELISA. We obtained previous data which found FLISA to be more reliable than ELISA, and also that accurate screenings were very important in proteomics, especially for drug discoveries.13, 14
To quantify the many factors in the proteomes of different types of samples, FLISA is a more efficient assay method than a conventional ELISA which involves multiple incubation and washing steps, and requires large amounts of antibodies. The FLISA method is a homogeneous bead-based immunoassay that requires no wash steps. Over 100-fold less captured antibody is required in FLISA than in a conventional ELISA. However, the most striking difference between the two methods is the time required for the assay. Occupation time of a typical FLISA is about 1hour, whereas a conventional ELISA will require several more hours.15 A minimal time requirement is a crucial factor for applications such as HTS in proteomic research in allergology. FLISA is thus an attractive method as it involves less hands-on time and lower running costs.15
In immunological studies using FLISA, measurements of interleukins and lymphocyte count in whole blood have been reported.10, 16 The beads-based system of the FLISA is readily applicable to other plate-based assays, such as non-radioactive kinase, phosphatase, and protease assays. A multiplexed bead-based receptor-ligand binding assay has already been demonstrated using FLISA.17, 18 In addition, FLISA is capable of detecting and quantifying fluorescence on living cells, allowing for such diverse assays as apoptosis and cytotoxicity, and cellular immunoassays, and receptor ligand binding assays.17-20 The FLISA system can be adapted for HTS of large libraries of proteomes, thus this system has a place in laboratories that routinely perform multiple, repetitive assays.
Immunological reactions such as production of IgE are controlled by Th1 and Th2 cytokines. Disease specific mutations for IgE suppressive factors such as IL-12, IL-18, and IFN-gamma have been revealed.6, 21, 22 For example, we previously studied IFN-gamma production from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with asthma or dermatitis.23 In most patients, both IL-18 and IL-12 induced the same magnitude of IFN-gamma production. However, in some patients, IL-18 induced only a small amount of IFN-gamma, while it was normal with IL-12.
In patients whose IFN gamma production with IL-18 is quite low, we found one amino acid deletion of the receptor. Predominant expression of the deletion of IL-18R alpha was associated with reduced IFN-gamma production by IL-18 but not IL-12, and was also associated with high serum IgE levels in children.24 The actual effect of this deletion remains to be clarified by further analyses of the system.
For analysis of the mechanisms, we used structural biology techniques using multinuclear and multidimensional NMR. NMR analyses were performed using 1D, 2D, 3D, and 4D NMR, and structural calculations and refinements revealed the structure of IL-18 at atomic resolution (Fig. 2).25
Sample preparation is usually performed with recombinant protein, which is produced in a heterologous organism such as E. coli26, 27 For example, the 15N-labeled and 15N-13C-labeled wild-type proteins are expressed as a GST-fusion protein. Following purification by affinity chromatography, the GST tag is removed by digestion with proteases. Samples for NMR measurements typically consisted of 1—2 mM protein in buffers with neutral pH and adequate salt, in H2O/2H2O or 2H2O.
NMR analyses are performed using high-field magnetic spectroscopy.28-32 NMR spectra can be acquired at approximately 310K on spectroscopy with a magnetic field such as 800 MHz NMR spectrometer. For assignment of the 1H, 13C and 15N resonances of the backbone and the side-chains, a series of three-dimensional experiments are performed. The stereospecific assignment of methyl groups of the Val and Leu residues was carried out. Distance restraints are obtained from 15N, 15N-, 15N, 13C- or 13C, 13C- resolved 4D NOESY experiments with an appropriate mixing time.
Structural calculations were performed as the third step. Initially, structure calculation and NOE peak assignment were performed in an iterative and manual manner using a specific program for calculation.33-38 Backbone torsion angle restraints were derived from 3JHNHa of HNHA. The torsion angles c1 of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and histidine, were estimated from 3JC'C and 3JNC coupling constants. After determining the global fold manually, an automated algorithm can be used for the assignment of the remaining NOE peaks, yielding meaningful NOE upper distance restraints. With these restraints, final structures were calculated using the refinement program. At this stage, hydrogen bond restraints from the slowly exchanging backbone amides can be added as distance restraints for N-O and for HN-O atom pairs respectively. Nonstereospecifically assigned protons were treated as a floating chirality. Usually, a total of 100 structures were refined and the 20 lowest energy structures were analyzed using structure verification software.
The determined IL-18 structure has the same protein folding as that of IL-1, but IL-18 is distinctively different from IL-1 in its functional properties.25, 39-44 This means that the presence of these structural differences reflects their functional differences. Structural comparison between the two showed relatively large differences in three parts. Although the folding of the proteins were quite similar, distribution of the electrostatic surface potentials between the two were very different (Fig. 3). These differences at an atomic level serve as the factors for molecular discrimination.
When we mapped the critical residues for the biological activity on the surface of the structure, we found that they formed three distinct sites, named as sites 1, 2, and 3 (Fig. 4). From other experimental findings such as protein-protein interactions, the ligand, IL-18, was seen to bind to IL-18Ralpha using sites 1 and 2, but not site 3.25, 45-51 When we viewed its 3-D structure, we could see that sites 1 and 2 were covered by a receptor with atomic interactions, whereas site 3 was completely free (Fig. 5).
Previously reported genetic polymorphisms are not involved within the three sites. One of the identified coding SNPs, R210H, had interactions with the ligand, IL-18, suggesting an effect for binding affinity.25, 52 The deletion of alanine 317 closely associates with the functional abnormality in IL-18 signaling.24, 25 Our modeling study indicates that the deletion should not change the overall structure, but make the link shorter at a point just before the transmembrane domain by approximately five angstroms.
Taken together with other experimental data, we could ascertain that a tertiary complex formation could be achieved by interactions with receptor alpha at sites 1 and 2. For receptor beta, site 3 and additional interactions between receptors would be involved.25, 51 The deletion should effect the signal transduction modifying the alignment of the intracellular domains. Other SNPs on 232 can also have a functional change on their receptor- receptor interactions.25, 51, 52
From these data, we can now classify interleukins by their structures (Fig. 6). Before our structural determination of IL-18, several structures had been revealed. Our study proposed a new structural class, beta- trefoil interleukins, IL-1 and IL-18. The additional structural investigations by our group and other research groups have shown a catalogue of interleukins. From these data, we have postulated a new classification for interleukins. The major group is alpha helix bundle types, with IL-8 being a member of the chemokines which is based on its structural properties in addition to its functional properties. The new class is the beta-trefoil group also in addition to other orphan classes.53-55
REFERENCES1
Fajardo I, Svensson L, Bucht A, Pejler G. Increased levels of hypoxia-sensitive protein in allergic airway inflammation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004; 170: 477-484.

2
Beyer K, Bardina L, Grishina G, Sampson HA. Identification of sesame seed allergens by 2-dimensional proteomics and Edman sequencing: seed storage proteins as common food allergens. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2002; 110: 154-159.

3
Fujimura T, Shigeta S, Kawamoto S et al. Two-dimensional IgE-binding spectrum of Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollen allergens. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2004; 133: 125-135.

4
Kelso A. Cytokines and their receptors: an overview. Ther. Drug Monit. 2000; 22: 40-43.

5
Ohnishi H, Kato Z, Watanabe M et al. Interleukin-18 is associated with the severity of atopic dermatitis. Allergol. Int. 2003; 52: 123-130.

6
Nakanishi K, Yoshimoto T, Tsutsui H, Okamura H. Interleukin-18 is a unique cytokine that stimulates both Th1 and Th2 responses depending on its cytokine milieu. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2001; 12: 53-72.

7
Shikano H, Kato Z, Kaneko H et al. IFN-gamma production in response to IL-18 or IL-12 stimulation by peripheral blood mononuclear cells of atopic patients. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2001; 31: 1263-1270.

8
Kondo N, Matsui E, Kaneko H et al. Reduced interferon-gamma production and mutations of the interleukin-12 receptor beta(2) chain gene in atopic subjects. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2001; 124: 117-120.

9
de Jager W, te Velthuis H, Prakken BJ, Kuis W, Rijkers GT. Simultaneous detection of 15 human cytokines in a single sample of stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin. Diagn. Lab Immunol. 2003; 10: 133-139.

10
Swartzman EE, Miraglia SJ, Mellentin-Michelotti J, Evangelista L, Yuan PM. A homogeneous and multiplexed immunoassay or high-throughput screening using fluorometric microvolume assay technology. Anal. Biochem. 1999; 271: 143-151.

11
Oliver DG, Sanders AH, Hogg RD, Hellman JW. Thermal gradients in microtitration plates. Effects on enzyme-linked immunoassay. J. Immunol. Methods 1981; 42: 195-201.

12
Shekarchi IC, Sever JL, Lee YJ, Castellano G, Madden DL. Evaluation of various plastic microtiter plates with measles, toxoplasma, and gamma globulin antigens in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1984; 19: 89-96.

13
Schapira M, Raaka BM, Das S et al. Discovery of diverse thyroid hormone receptor antagonists by high-throughput docking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003; 100: 7354-7359.

14
Morokata T, Ida K, Yamada T. Characterization of YM-90709 as a novel antagonist which inhibits the binding of interleukin-5 to interleukin-5 receptor. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2004; 4: 873-883.

15
Oelschlaeger P, Srikant-Iyer S, Lange S, Schmitt J, Schmid RD. Fluorophor-linked immunosorbent assay: a time- and cost-saving method for the characterization of antibody fragments using a fusion protein of a single-chain antibody fragment and enhanced green fluorescent protein. Anal. Biochem. 2002; 309: 27-34.

16
Dietz LJ, Dubrow RS, Manian BS, Sizto NL. Volumetric capillary cytometry: a new method for absolute cell enumeration. Cytometry 1996; 23: 177-186.

17
Melletin-Michelotti J, Evangelista LT, Swartzman EE, Miraglia SJ, Werner WE, Yuan PM. Determination of ligand binding affinities for endogenous seven-transmembrane receptors using fluorometric microvolume assay technology. Anal. Biochem. 1999; 272: 182-190.

18
Martens C, Bakker A, Rodriguez A et al. A generic particle-based nonradioactive homogeneous multiplex method for high-throughput screening using microvolume fluorimetry. Anal. Biochem. 1999; 273: 20-31.

19
Miraglia S, Swartman EE, Mellentin-Michelotti J et al. Homogeneous Cell- and Bead-Based Assays for High Throughput Screening Using Fluorometric Microvolume Assay Technology. J. Biomol. Screen 1999; 4: 193-204.

20
Lee JY, Miraglia S, Yan X et al. Oncology drug discovery applications using the FMAT 8100 HTS system. J. Biomol. Screen 2003; 8: 81-88.

21
Okamura H, Tsutsui H, Komatsu T et al. Cloning of a new cytokine that induces IFN-g production by T-cells. Nature 1995; 378: 88-91.

22
Ushio S, Namba M, Okura T et al. Cloning of the cDNA for human IFN-γ-inducing factor, expression in Escherichia coli, and studies on the biologic actives of the protein. J. Immunol. 1996; 156: 4274-4279.

23
Shikano H, Kato Z, Kaneko H et al. IFN-gamma production in response to IL-18 or IL-12 stimulation by peripheral blood mononuclear cells of atopic patients. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2001; 31: 1263-1270.

24
Watanabe M, Kaneko H, Shikano H et al. Predominant expression of 950delCAG of IL-18R alpha chain cDNA is associated with reduced IFN-gamma production and high serum IgE levels in atopic Japanese children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2002; 109: 669-675.

25
Kato Z, Jee J, Shikano H et al. The structure and binding mode of interleukin-18. Nature Struct. Biol. 2003; 10: 966-971.

26
Omoya K, Kato Z, Matsukuma E et al. Systemic optimization of active protein expression using GFP as a folding reporter. Protein Expr. Purif. 2004; 36: 327-332.

27
Li A, Kato Z, Ohnishi H et al. Optimized gene synthesis and high expression of human interleukin-18. Protein Expr. Purifi. 2003; 32: 110-118.

28
Cavanagh J, Fairbrother WJ, Palmer AG III, Skelton NJ. Protein NMR Spectroscopy. San Diego: Academic Press, 1996.
29
Hu W, Zuiderweg ER. Stereospecific assignments of Val and Leu methyl groups in a selectively 13C-labeled 18kDa polypeptide using 3D CT-(H)CCH-COSY and 2D 1JC-C edited heteronuclear correlation experiments. J. Magn. Reson. 1996; 113: 70-75.

30
Guentert P, Mumenthaler C, Wuethrich K. Torsion angle dynamics for NMR structure calculation with the new program DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 1997; 273: 283-298.

31
Cornilescu G, Delaglio F, Bax A. Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology. J. Biomol. NMR. 1999; 13: 289-302.

32
Hu JS, Grzesiek S, Bax A. Two-dimensional NMR methods for determining c1 angles of aromatic residues in proteins from three bond JC'Cg and JNCg couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 1803-1804.

33
Herrmann T, Guntert P, Wuethrich K. Protein NMR structure determination with automated NOE assignment using the new software CANDID and the torsion angle dynamics algorithm DYANA. J. Mol. Biol. 2002; 319: 209-227.

34
Brunger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallog. D. 1998; 54: 905-921.

35
Koradi R, Billeter M, Wuethrich K. MOLMOL: a program for the display and analysis of macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Graph. 1996; 14: 51-55.

36
Laskowski RA, Rullman JAC, MacArthur MW, Kaptein R, Thornton JM. AQUA and PROCHECK-NMR: programs for checking the quality of protein structures solved by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 1996; 8: 477-486.

37
Chemical Computing Group Inc. MOE: The Molecular Operating Environment. Montreal: 1999.
38
Case DA. AMBER 5. San Francisco: University of California, 1997.
39
Vigers GP, Anderson LJ, Caffes P, Brandhuber BJ. Crystal structure of the type-I interleukin-1 receptor complexed with interleukin-1beta. Nature 1997; 386: 190-194.

40
Schreuder H, Tardif C, Trump-Kallmeyer S et al. A new cytokine-receptor binding mode revealed by the crystal structure of the IL-1 receptor with an antagonist. Nature 1997; 386: 194-200.

41
Bazan JF, Timans JC, Kastelein RA. A newly defined interleukin-1? Nature 1996; 379: 591.

42
Konishi K, Tanabe F, Taniguchi M et al. A simple and sensitive bioassay for the detection of human interleukin-18/interferon-g-inducing factor using human myelomonocytic KG-1 cells. J. Immunol. Methods 1997; 209: 187-191.

43
Evans RJ, Bray J, Childs JD et al. Mapping receptor binding sites in interleukin (IL)-receptor antagonist and IL-1 beta by site-directed mutagenesis. Identification of a single site in IL-1ra and two sites in IL-1 beta. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 11477-11483.

44
Kim SH, Azam T, Novick D et al. Identification of amino acid residues critical for biological activity in human interleukin-18. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 10998-11003.

45
Born TL, Thomassen E, Bird TA, Sims JE. Cloning of a novel receptor subunit, AcPL, required for interleukin-18 signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 273: 29445-29450.

46
DeVos AM, Ultsch M, Kossiakoff AA. Human growth hormone and extracellular domain of its receptor: crystal structure of the complex. Science 1992; 255: 306-312.

47
Wiesmann C, de Vos AM. Variations on ligand-receptor complexes. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000; 7: 440-442.

48
Wells JA, de Vos AM. Hematopoietic receptor complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996; 65: 609-634.

49
Hage T, Sebald W, Reinemer P. Crystal structure of the interleukin-4/receptor alpha chain complex reveals a mosaic binding interface. Cell 1999; 97: 271-281.

50
Schlessinger J, Plotnikov AN, Ibrahimi OA et al. Crystal structure of a ternary FGF-FGFR-heparin complex reveals a dual role for heparin in FGFR binding and dimerization. Mol. Cell 2000; 6: 743-750.

51
Auron PE. The interleukin 1 receptor: ligand interactions and signal transduction. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 1998; 9: 221-237.

52
Entrez SNP. (Available from web: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=Snp).
53
Kumar S, McDonnell PC, Lehr R et al. Identification and initial characterization of four novel members of the interleukin-1 family. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 10308-10314.

54
Born TL, Smith DE, Garka KE, Renshaw BR, Bertles JS, Sims JE. Identification and characterization of two members of a novel class of the interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) family. J .Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 29946-29954.

55
Kim SH, Eisenstein M, Reznikov L et al. Structural requirements of six naturally occurring isoforms of the IL-18 binding protein to inhibit IL-18. Proc. Natl.Acad.Sci. U.S.A. 2000; 97: 1190-1195.

56
Xiang Y, Moss B. Determination of the functional epitopes of human interleukin-18-binding protein by site-directed mutagenesis. J.Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 17380-17386.

57
Yamamoto Y, Kato Z, Matsukuma E et al. Generation of highly stable IL-18 based on a ligand-receptor complex structure. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004; 317: 181-186.

58
Vigers GP, Dripps DJ, Edwards CK 3rd, Brandhuber BJ. X-ray crystal structure of a small antagonist peptide bound to interleukin-1 receptor type 1. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 36927-36933.
